I hit a wall a couple of posts in, essentially because I felt guilty spending time blogging about this when I should be doing research. I’m a bit over a month from having a 10,000 word paper due, and while I have done a reasonable amount of reading (perhaps a third of what I need to have done) I have not distilled the precise topic.
The area is regionalism, Australia in the region, and regional responses to security. Yes that’s extremely broad for a field that needs to be turned into a topic. But I’ve found multiple aspects of this interesting.
So much regional theory reflects the EU while attempting to draw ‘objective’ or ‘observable’ traits that apply to regions as some amorphous concept. This is obviously because the EU is the great success story (to date…) of the regional integration project, and more generally has been a welcome alternative model for policy makers and academics uneasy with the US.
I understand and share much of that admiration, but suspect many of the reasons for the EU’s success were quite specific to that grouping and may be a long way off for other prospective regions like ‘Asia’. In particular the generally common acceptance of social democratic principles in Western Europe, the unique security umbrella that was provided by NATO, and the axis of general goodwill between France and Germany that arose in part from the sheer exhaustion both felt after centuries of antagonism resulted in two horrific wars.
Even in Southeast Asia, which arguably has the most successful regional integration architecture in the Asia-Pacific, there is nothing approaching this level of compact. The strongest common philosophies that bind those nations would appear to be ‘non-interference’ and a general lingering resentment relating to colonialism. From Australia’s point-of-view, neither buttresses our claim to (or even our interest in) membership of that grouping at a higher level of regionness (a rather ungainly word that has nonetheless gained much traction in the debates on this topic).
That’s not to say we shouldn’t pursue closer relations, just that EU-style aspirations may be beyond even the medium term radar. At least where the focus is on geographical region.